Tuesday, March 13, 2012

What about Poe drove him to write such morbid works?


Edgar Allan Poe was born in Boston, Massachusetts, and became an orphan child shortly after. He was abandoned by his father and his mother died when he was just a child. The Allan family of Virginia took him in, but they never legally adopted him.


Above, is a picture of Edgar Allan Poe, and you can see through the expression on his face that he was a very different man. He was a very crooked man and this is shown through many of his works. His imagination was wild, and he is known for his invention of the detective fiction genre. Like we discussed in class, it's almost like he was determined to come up with the perfect murder and a sneaky way around it. Some of his works have been described as morbid, but that was something he knew about and something he felt.

To me, "The Fall of the House of Usher" was the strangest of the these two works. The theme of melancholy is so powerful in this work. It expresses a gloomy state of mind, even depression. The video below is a clip from a film that was based on this particular work. Although there are no words, I really "felt" the emotion behind it. The music enhanced it for me, as well. If I were to sit down to write a story, this would not be remotely close to what I would choose, and I think it has a lot to do with the troubles and emotions Poe dealt with throughout his life.


All the women in his life were taken from him due to illnesses and incurable diseases such as Tuberculosis at the time. This is probably one of the main forces behind his uncomfortable works. Substance abuse is a big part of many of his stories, including "Ligeia". In this particular story, it is implied that the narrator is an opium addict. Opium is a drug made from the poppy plant. It was used for medical and recreational purposes, but too much of it can cause alteration of thought and become addicting.

"In the excitement of my opium-dreams, I would call aloud upon her name, during the silence of the night...as if...I could restore her to the pathway she had abandoned...upon the earth."

This is a direct quote from "Ligeia" that gives indirect evidence that the narrator is dealing with some form of mental issue and/or drug addiction. It allows the reader to interpret that the dreams he is having are nothing short of hallucinations provided to him by opium intake.

Many of Poe's stories involve an unnamed narrator in which the reader can question the validity behind his thoughts and words. The confusion in his works can relate to the confusion in his life. Literature is Poe's escape from reality and a way for him to express his feelings.


This is a cover for "Ligeia" showing herself and Rowena. The theme of strong will is portrayed through this piece. Strong will is supposedly what keeps someone alive. Although it is not stated whether it was Ligeia's will or the narrator's, we do know that will is what caused her resurrection. "Only the strong survive" is not only used in this story, but in Poe's life as well. He faced many challenges in his life that must have been hard to endure and ones he may have never overcame, emotionally being the worst. I know I probably would have never made it a day in his shoes. Many people may see Poe as a crooked man and a strange writer, but with the life he had, I can see why his works were written the way that they were.

Works Cited:
http://www.poedecoder.com/essays/usher/
http://www.poemuseum.org/life.php
http://www.shmoop.com/ligeia/summary.html
http://www.biography.com/people/edgar-allan-poe-9443160

Tuesday, March 6, 2012

What message did Douglass’ speech “What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?” portray to the people?


Frederick Douglass spent a lot of his time traveling and delivering speech to people all over. At the end of his touring days, his act did not stop. He took on a role as an abolitionist and continued to share his beliefs.

This specific speech was delivered on July 5 in 1862 and is known to have been one of the most moving speeches he had ever delivered to the people. It commemorated the signing of the Declaration of Independence and questioned its purpose. Below is an image of the Declaration of Independence, the document he solely focuses on during this speech.


Did slaves really have the independence that was supposedly given through this document? “This Fourth of July is yours, not mine. You may rejoice, I must mourn.” This was a direct quote from this particular speech. To me this means that for all those who the document can and does apply to certainly have the right to rejoice in their freedom, but for the slaves, this can not be the case. Can freedom be assigned to a certain class of people or does is apply to all? He explains that to the victim, or slave, this document serves as an act of cruelty or injustice. It tells them of their freedom, but they don’t truly have it. The rejoicing that was taken place was heartless and selfish. All those who can honestly rejoice with freedom that isn’t given to EVERYONE were considered hypocrits. Douglass looked at this situation as one of disgrace.


In deliverance of this speech, Douglass states that he is not included in the anniversary of this day. The benefits of this was not extended to himself or those like him. He uses imagery when comparing that the sunlight of this document brought life and healing to others, while death to himself. He reveals his strong feelings towards this day of the year. He feels that our nation had “never looked blacker” to him than on this day as a result of the mockery he felt the slaves were receiving. 



This video shares a short part of his speech. It may be short, but I feel like it was one of the most important parts in the entire address. His entire goal was to scorn the people of the wrongfulness in slavery. That for the slaves, there is no “Independence Day”. “There is not a man beneath the canopy of heaven that does not know that slavery is wrong for him”. I consider this a very powerful statement, simply because it’s true. For our nation to be an "under God" nation, does this type of treatment make sense? God himself would not support something such as slavery. There is not a man of any race that would find it morally right to slave himself to another. I think he made his point very clear, and even though none of us experienced this day in age, I think we could all agree with his point. No one deserves freedom over another, and if it's not distributed equally and without standards, that it is meaningless. 

Works Cited: